Capture the exact wording
Record the proposed statement and where it appears. Similar-sounding sentences can imply different levels of certainty.
Connect the source
Attach the supporting record or primary reference and note its limits. Missing support is a reason to revise or remove the statement.
Track approval separately
Evidence and approval are different fields. A reviewer should confirm whether the final wording preserves the source’s meaning and the business scope.
Put it to work
A practical next step
Use columns for claim, page, source, limits, reviewer, version and review trigger.
Keep the evidence with the decision.
Save the baseline, the reason for the change and the person responsible for checking it. This makes the work easier to review later and helps your team distinguish a verified improvement from an untested assumption.
This note provides a planning framework. The right implementation depends on your business model, market, website and available records. Where a decision involves scientific interpretation, clinical services or legal status, use the appropriate qualified reviewer rather than treating marketing guidance as approval.
Sources and review context.
For the limits of research-use wording, see the FDA’s Gram Peptides warning letter. For search-system guidance, consult Google’s helpful content guidance. These sources provide context, not approval of a specific business.
Related agency support
Content Review ↗
Review the service scope and use the briefing tool to describe your current situation.